City Gloss

Audit requirement of occupation freelance jobs the Federal Labor Court has in a new ruling by the 13.10.2011 with the inclusion of severely disabled people during the occupation of freelance jobs is concerned. It has decided that all employers are obliged to examine whether they can occupy free jobs with severely disabled people. To include also unemployed or seeking work reported severely disabled people, they need to contact early on with the employment agency. This in article 81 paragraph 1 SGB IX controlled legal obligation to all employers, not only that of the public service. A rejected severely disabled applicants can rely on the fact that the breach of this obligation suspect its discrimination because of disability leave.

The severely disabled with a degree of 60 plaintiffs has completed a commercial apprenticeship, a University of applied sciences degree of in business administration and education to the higher administrative service. He applied to the respondent municipality on its position for a Maternity representation in the areas of human resources, planning, real estate and Public Affairs Office. The defendant occupied that can be place otherwise, without previously checking whether the free workplace filled with severely disabled people or in contact with the employment agency have recorded. The plaintiff demanded a compensation affiliated under 15 para 2 of the General equal treatment Act (AGG), because he looked at a disadvantage because of his disability. While the lower courts had dismissed the lawsuit, the revision of the plaintiff before the 8th Senate of the Federal Labour Court in principle was successful.

The audit requirement to take account of severely disabled persons in the filling of vacant posts is always, and to all employers, regardless of whether a severely disabled person who applied or has revealed this status in his application. An employer violates this duty of inspection, so that an indication is, that he hurt a rejected severely disabled people because of the disability, because he his Support obligations had left unnoticed. Because in this case the employer could refute not the presumption of such a disadvantage, the thing on the work of the Court was to remit, which will have to decide about the amount of compensation payable to the claimant. Lawyers Dr. Mahlstedt & partners – your law firm in Bremen. For more information on the disability law on our specialty page behindertenrecht.php

This is thus so that other parts of the program do not modify them directly, but through the functions of the object. In summary an object is characterized by: The designers define new classes (or types) of objects. The objects own a series of operations associated them. The operations tend to be generic, that is to say, they operate on multiple types of data. The classes or types of objects share common components by means of inheritance mechanisms. In order to be able to describe all the objects of a program, it agrees to group these in classes.

Class: We can consider a class like a collection of objects that own common characteristics and operations. A class contains all the information necessary to create new objects. Encapsulation: We have already described it superficially previously but really it is a technique that allows to locate and to hide the details of an object. The encapsulation comes up that an object is manipulated by operations different from the defined ones. The encapsulation is like a black box that hides the data and it only allows to accede to them of controlled form. Finally I will expose as a class for example Crectangulo is used, and is of the following way: class CRectangle int x, and; public: void set_values (int, int); int area (void); rect; We explain this with other words: class ” CRectangle” and the object is called ” rect” variables to act ” x” (long) ” y” (wide) and they are of whole value method I publish (they can accede)? ” void set_values (int, int); ” to introduce values long and wide? ” int area (void); ” result of nmrico of the area In a following delivery I will deepen more in these aspects.

This disposition indicates that once declared the contest, the acts detrimental for the active mass realised by the indebted one within both years previous to the date of declaration will be rescindable, although fraudulent intention would not have existed. The legal prohibition would not enter game here of financial attendance for the acquisition of action/own participation, since the rescindable acts do not have to suffer from intrinsic vice some, but the foundation of the rescission would consist unique and exclusively of the injury of the active mass. Here the interested ones in the rescission would try to credit before the Court of the Mercantile thing that the sobreindebtedness of target company derived from the price to satisfy the salesmen constitutes a clear reduction of its patrimony and that the payment of this price, when lacking counterpart some in favor of target company or at least equivalent from the point of view of the integrity of the competing credits, harmed the active mass. The intention of the participants in the LBO would be completely irrelevant. Secondly, opposition of LBO ex- article 71,6 of Law Competing, according to which the exercise of the rescissory actions will not prevent the one of other actions of opposition of acts of indebted which they come according to right, which will be able to be exercised before the judge of the contest. In case of resorting to this route, the interested ones – now yes they would invoke before the Court of Mercantile the infringement of the legal prohibition of financial for acquisition of action/own participation, null attendance of right plenary session in accordance with article 6,3 of the Civil Code. Unlike the previous alternative, in this case the action would not be subject to temporary limit some, since the invalidity action never prescribes. Consequences of a successful opposition Evidently, the consequences of the success of the opposition of the LBO would be traumatic as much from the economic point of view like legal. .