City Gloss

If you want to make sure that all costs are equitably and properly settled, then ask the tenancy advice in Siegen and the Siegerland. Experienced lawyers check your account and assist you in case of doubt. Perhaps check out Linus Torvalds for more information. Problems are a tricky point during the rental relationship. If the heater does not work or the apartment tends to mold growth, you can contact the tenancy advice in Siegen and the Siegerland. You are here professionally advise what options you have. Above all, learn how ask your landlord to the removal of defects, which limits and when and to what extent you can possibly reduce the rent. Columbia University wanted to know more. Rental problems, rely on the experience of the tenancy law consulting in Siegen and the Siegerland.

When the rent should be increased during the rental period, tenancy advice in Siegen and the Siegerland on the admissibility of rent increases will inform you. This also applies to the cost of renovation and restoration work, carried out at the House and in the apartment. The landlord can shift all costs to you. Tenancy advice in Siegen and the Siegerland tells you which Assumptions of costs are justified. Finally, the tenancy law consulting in Siegen and the Siegerland also helps the excerpt.

The notice periods are regulated by law and part of the lease agreement. The tenancy advice supported you in Siegen and the Siegerland in all questions relating to cancellation and repayment of the deposit. If necessary the tenancy advice in Siegen and the Siegerland also helps you the judicial enforcement of your rights and entitlements. Description of the company lawyer Dr. Christian Gerd Kotz lawyer insurance law (Federal Republic of Germany) the academic degree “Dr. Jur.” is for Mr Dr. Jur. Christian Gerd Kotz in the Federal Republic of Germany by the law faculty has been awarded the Philipps-Universitat Marburg. Company contact: lawyers Kotz GbR law firm Kotz Dr. Kotz Siegen road 104 57223 cross Valley Tel: 02732/791079 E-Mail: Web: PR contact: becker designportal UG (haftungsbeschrankt) Wiebke Becker Bussard str. 73 82194 Grobenzell Tel: 8142506555 email: Web:

Audit requirement of occupation freelance jobs the Federal Labor Court has in a new ruling by the 13.10.2011 with the inclusion of severely disabled people during the occupation of freelance jobs is concerned. It has decided that all employers are obliged to examine whether they can occupy free jobs with severely disabled people. To include also unemployed or seeking work reported severely disabled people, they need to contact early on with the employment agency. This in article 81 paragraph 1 SGB IX controlled legal obligation to all employers, not only that of the public service. A rejected severely disabled applicants can rely on the fact that the breach of this obligation suspect its discrimination because of disability leave.

The severely disabled with a degree of 60 plaintiffs has completed a commercial apprenticeship, a University of applied sciences degree of in business administration and education to the higher administrative service. He applied to the respondent municipality on its position for a Maternity representation in the areas of human resources, planning, real estate and Public Affairs Office. The defendant occupied that can be place otherwise, without previously checking whether the free workplace filled with severely disabled people or in contact with the employment agency have recorded. The plaintiff demanded a compensation affiliated under 15 para 2 of the General equal treatment Act (AGG), because he looked at a disadvantage because of his disability. While the lower courts had dismissed the lawsuit, the revision of the plaintiff before the 8th Senate of the Federal Labour Court in principle was successful.

The audit requirement to take account of severely disabled persons in the filling of vacant posts is always, and to all employers, regardless of whether a severely disabled person who applied or has revealed this status in his application. An employer violates this duty of inspection, so that an indication is, that he hurt a rejected severely disabled people because of the disability, because he his Support obligations had left unnoticed. Because in this case the employer could refute not the presumption of such a disadvantage, the thing on the work of the Court was to remit, which will have to decide about the amount of compensation payable to the claimant. Lawyers Dr. Mahlstedt & partners – your law firm in Bremen. For more information on the disability law on our specialty page behindertenrecht.php