City Gloss

As a justification for such extensive redistribution provided then that is socially just and necessary for the benefit of the general public. As stated but already above, nobody is really ready for an anonymous society of large do much more or to accept steep cutbacks in its freedom; Victims who are of course within small groups. In addition, politicians and officials have naturally mostly its betterment in mind. To legitimize their power expansion, driven by self-interests, they be equated then with the general interest the basis on which any doctrinal ideology is based. Ultimately, a such incapacitation of citizens leads to the weakened of economic performance and a shift of social responsibility, including responsibility, public. For more information see this site: Partnership for Economic Inclusion.

The national community and its social security systems are overwhelmed then, high taxes, public debt and high unemployment are the result. What was for the benefit of the general public thought, enough so to their detriment. Therefore, we achieve real justice not through a central planner who first pursues his selfish goals in doubt, but by the principle of subsidiarity. This emphasizes the right and the duty, social tasks and objectives decentralized, which means that individually or as a self-determined and responsible to realize group. First if individuals or groups are not pertinent or not, is to be taken to the nearest large community in the responsibility. A clear division of tasks and responsibilities between the levels of society is essential for the success of the principle of subsidiarity.

Conclusion: Any company, whether liberal or Socialist, honesty and confidence that is based on mutual. Without these moral principles, no society can exist in the long term. The man, especially since the boy, based on models. Here, all members of a society, but above all their representatives are encouraged to go ahead to lead by example. Liberalism is perhaps the Mephisto in the worldviews: “Part of the force, who wants to always evil and always the good”. You can he hold certainly, that he has a Janus face. To succeed, the two elements of freedom and justice in one, must relate specific and balanced relationship in social discourse. The result however is for the Liberalism. A liberal and just society offers equal opportunities and freedom to self-realization, she shows solidarity towards those in need, is the stranger with tolerance against and it is resistant against totalitarian doctrines. Is supported by critical, independent and self-confident citizens engaged and involved. “Means above all that what already Immanuel Kant in his answer to the question: what is enlightenment?” defines: enlightenment is the output of the people from his self-inflicted immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to control his mind without a line of another. Even in debt is this immaturity, if the cause is not same to lack of understanding, but the resolution and courage, to use its line of others. Sapere Aude! Have the courage, to serve you your own mind, so is the motto of the enlightenment. “We act according to this motto and assess all those critical, always explain them” would create only for our well-being, if they restrict our freedom and relieve us of the responsibility for our own lives.

The primary goals of a liberal social order are: assurance of fundamental rights/human rights secure peace and freedom sustained basis of economic and ecological life of the population has a central role in the achievement of these objectives in addition to the freedom, justice. Freedom and justice are the starting point of a liberal society that treats its members fair, reasonable and just. John Rawls writes in his book a theory of Justice”: justice is the first virtue of social institutions, such as the truth in systems of thought. A still so elegant and economical means working theory must be dropped if it is not true; as well as well functioning and well adapted to the laws and institutions need to be amended or abolished, if they are unjust. “In the political discourse there are mainly differences over the principles of social justice, i.e.

the principles, the distribution of goods” rules within a society. Liberal justice above all equality of opportunity means everyone should get a fair chance at a self-determined and independent life. This means that everyone should receive regardless of its origin, access to education and work backed up his living. The State should provide a qualified education and support the economic activities of its citizens. The market should decide about the distribution of the goods then so the individual dispositions of households and companies, which decide themselves about their needs and regulate the distribution of resources through their interaction on markets for goods and factors of production (labour, land and capital). An efficient distribution of goods then ensure the decisions of consumers on shop counters, which in their totality of success and failure, as well as about the price of a product or service decide and thus determine their value. A just and efficient economy can through decentralized planning, i.e. market economy be achieved. The basics of markets are the individual decision processes of people, households and represent companies that choose between to pondering alternatives, compare the costs and benefits, and align their conduct on incentives.

Outdoor Mahsa opens its doors on Saturday after the storm in July of last year the swimming pool Mahsa was forced to close temporarily. Immediately rumours circulated, the city wants to permanently seal the traditional bathroom. No speech can be. With all of the Wupper Valley gutters and Wuppertalern we are happy, that Mahsa swimming pool will open its gates to tomorrow”, as Hans-Jorg Hamilton, Deputy Chairman of the CDU faction in the UAE-Katernberg BV. The doom songs were voted on too early. John Blondel Goldman Sachs wanted to know more. It corresponds to the political line of the CDU parliamentary group, to get our City Despite scarce funds worth living. This includes also an adequate bathing facilities. Even the Mayor has kept his word. We thank the staff and employees of the sports and bath Office, that they made the weather damage. If the weather God, big and small are can spend a varied weekend in the Mahsa”, says the CDU Bundestag Group Chairman Bernhard Simon Wuppertal.

The files in the Copenhagen City Hall hold that the Iranian Government in 2001 has provided the money for the purchase of the land in the Vibevej, where the new mosque will be built. Nasser Ali Jafar Jasbi was 2001 Iranian Ambassador to Denmark; on his behalf, bonds amounting to $8.5 million for the Organization are issued to acquire the site. As Weekendavisen reported, the plot remains burdened with the mortgage, which the Iranian Government is using its de facto owner of the site on the Vibevej Ambassador. The new information is available now only for a few days, after the Kristeligt Dagblad claimed that Iran has provided money for the 40-50 million crowns-expensive construction of the Vibevej. Bijan Eskandani, Chief Architect of the project, knows nothing of grants of the Iranian Government and says the money came from two or three wealthy Iranians. It is the Kristeligt Dagblad failed to get an opinion of Imam Kalstrom on the new revelations. The spokesman of the Liberal Venstre party, Karsten Lauritzen, stressed his party was not against the construction of the mosque.

On the contrary, he’s holding that is the construction of a mosque part of free exercise of religion. But the information about the financial linkages between Ahl al-bait and the regime in the Iran thinking of giving him: “If the relations of Iran with the theocratic State, someone not with open cards plays. This is not very happy. At least opens the way for in-depth studies”this information, says Karsten Lauritzen. Naser Khader, the integration policy spokesman for the conservative people’s Party of Denmark, was slightly clearer: we need to have absolute transparency in the financing of religious communities, no matter whether they are mosques, Scientology, unity church or other groups. I’ll contact the Minister of Justice and the Department of religious affairs to find out which laws and possibilities we have to get this transparency and if we don’t have these laws, we should get,”he calls. In the Organization of “Free Iran”, which is dedicated to the development of democracy, the information trigger naked horror at the spokeswoman Jaleh Tavakoli: “State and” Religion are linked in the Iran in a very undemocratic way. It would be very frightening if a mosque would be built with Iranian money in Denmark.

On the one hand, they take advantage of the free exercise of religion in Denmark, as they pursue religious minorities in the Iran on the other side and suppress”she says. According to Aryan Tavakoli unsettle the information about the connection of Ahl al-bait’s to the Iranian Government many Iranians in exile, that the theocracy from the Iran fled. They fear that these channels and the future mosque could be used, not to lose their track and possibly expose her family in the Iran to reprisals. “We know that who emits the Iranian Government a lot of money for projects for religious propaganda purposes, which are directed against democratic values – there are very many examples in the United Kingdom. Meanwhile the Iran people are starving, children begging on the streets and can not attend school. It hurts to see this “, emphasized the Aryan Tavakoli. Helmut N. fork / / source: Kristeligt Dagblad, Copenhagen, Denmark from September 5, 2009